- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:21:18 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5030 David_E3@VERIFONE.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needsDrafting ------- Comment #1 from David_E3@VERIFONE.com 2008-01-23 21:21 ------- Phase I agreement: 1 yes, assertions on simple types 2 do not change the existing built-ins-only rule (n.b. this also prevents circularity) 3 appears as new property of simple types (not as new facet) 4 context item is string value of the item, as xs:untypedAtomic (alternatives: string value as xs:string, or string value as the appropriate primitive (anySimpleType for lists or unions), or string value as anySimpleType) 5 Assertions legal on restriction and on list and on union (i.e. any simple type constructor). (Alternative: on restriction only.) The WG discussed that another alternative for point 4 would be to use the base type, both for atomics and for lists, i.e. if I'm asserting something of a list of my:specialDate, take it into XPath as a list of xs:date. MKay said IIRC the context item cannot be a list. Ref: M. Kay's note http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2008Jan/0013.html
Received on Wednesday, 23 January 2008 21:21:24 UTC