- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:40:13 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needsAgreement Status Whiteboard|medium, work |medium, work, editorial | |cluster ------- Comment #1 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2008-01-03 16:40 ------- This is in some sense an editorial issue, but I believe the WG needs to discuss our policy on the question, so I'm marking it needsAgreement, rather than 'editorial'. Without having reviewed the notes in question, I suspect that in at least some cases, the MUST/MAY/SHOULD language in the notes is intended as a summary or restatement of normative rules specified more formally elsewhere, or as a way of making explicit some consequence of the normative rules elsewhere. We'll need careful editorial thinking about the right way to solve this problem without either descending to confusing formulations or requiring clutter like "It is a consequence of rules specified elsewhere that ..." everywhere.
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 16:40:17 UTC