- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:29:34 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5003 ------- Comment #12 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-01-17 18:29 ------- >It will not come as a surprise to any of you that I am among those who would favor exploring that option [relax the tree trimming rules]. let me summarize: * Does not .... But what it does do is to destroy the property that you can validate an element, label it with a type annotation, and then copy the element to a new tree knowing that the type annotation will still be sound. That property is extremely important to QT. I do sympathize with the argument that attribute inheritance will introduce a lot of new complexity. After all, that's the way namespaces work, and we know how much they have to answer for in terms of adding complexity.
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2008 18:29:45 UTC