- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:08:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5466
Summary: Point out the cases where attribute prohibitions are
pointless
Product: XML Schema
Version: 1.0 only
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1
AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org
ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org
QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
BugsThisDependsOn: 2311
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2311,
to track the problem for XSD 1.0 +++
AFAIK attribute prohibitions (use="prohibited") are only significant
when restricting a type; i.e. when they appear as children of <restriction>
and <complexType>.
Any other occurrences of such prohibitions should be pointless,
but there's no consensus between various schema processors.
An explicit statement about where prohibitions are pointless could
be of help here. Generating a warning when we hit such pointless
prohibitions would deminish confusion on the schema authors side.
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 20:08:09 UTC