- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 20:08:00 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5466 Summary: Point out the cases where attribute prohibitions are pointless Product: XML Schema Version: 1.0 only Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 AssignedTo: cmsmcq@w3.org ReportedBy: cmsmcq@w3.org QAContact: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org BugsThisDependsOn: 2311 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #2311, to track the problem for XSD 1.0 +++ AFAIK attribute prohibitions (use="prohibited") are only significant when restricting a type; i.e. when they appear as children of <restriction> and <complexType>. Any other occurrences of such prohibitions should be pointless, but there's no consensus between various schema processors. An explicit statement about where prohibitions are pointless could be of help here. Generating a warning when we hit such pointless prohibitions would deminish confusion on the schema authors side.
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 20:08:09 UTC