- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:17:38 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1913 cmsmcq@w3.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|major |normal Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Keywords|resolved |editorial, needsDrafting Priority|P4 |P2 Resolution|FIXED | Status Whiteboard| |terminology cluster ------- Comment #3 from cmsmcq@w3.org 2008-03-08 15:17 ------- The wording proposal adopted to resolve this issue appears to have linked many occurrences of the string 'derived' to the definition in the Datatypes spec, possibly all of them, but certainly more of them than are in fact referring to the concept of type derivation as defined there. All occurrences of the string need to be reviewed and selectively unlinked from Datatypes (and possibly relinked to some more appropriate target within the Structures spec).
Received on Saturday, 8 March 2008 15:17:46 UTC