- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 09:44:56 +0000
- To: www-xml-schema-comments@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5074 ------- Comment #4 from mike@saxonica.com 2008-01-03 09:44 ------- It's also worth noting that the general tone of section 2.2.2 is explanatory and introductory: section 2 is headed "Conceptual Framework", and I think most readers would not expect to find detailed rules about the validity of element declarations in that section unless they are repeated elsewhere. In this case I think it's fairly clear that the statement in 2.2.2.2 is intended as a summary of the intent of rule 4 of Schema Component Constraint: Element Declaration Properties Correct. This kind of thing is a minefield when writing specifications: it's often helpful to give a high-level overview of the rules, but it's difficult to ensure that this isn't mistaken for the real thing. As for the original point: yes, a member of a substitution group can have wildly different content from that of the substitution group head; but only to the extent that the definition of the head element permits this.
Received on Thursday, 3 January 2008 09:45:08 UTC