www-tag@w3.org from March 2005 by subject

[Fwd: simple barenames for schema component designators] last call: "XML Schema: Component Designators" [abstractComponentRefs-37]

[Removed]

[RFC3023Charset-21] TAG position (was: Status of issues/findings I 'own')

[schemeProtocols-49] New issue on relationship of URI schemes to protocols and operations

[URNsAndRegistries-50] New issue on URNs and their uses

Action Completed: announce SchemeProtocols-49

Binary XML (was: Re: Draft minutes of 15 March 2005 Telcon)

C14N isn't widely used?

Draft Agenda of 15 March 2005 TAG teleconference

Draft Agenda of 22 March 2005 TAG teleconference

Draft Agenda of 29 March 2005 TAG teleconference

Draft Agenda of 8 March 2005 TAG teleconference

Draft minutes of 15 March 2005 Telcon

Draft minutes of 28 Feb 2005 f2f

Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 8, Mar 2005

Fwd: URN usage and arrangements

How do you extend the HTTP?

IETF XML formats use lots of URNs for namespace names

Lack of layering in WS (Was: RFC 2616 (rfc2616) - Hypertext Transfer Protocol ...)

lack of ubiquitous lookup for URN NIDs leads to sloppy use [URNsAndRegistries-50]

Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting

Possible regrets: (Re: Draft Agenda of 29 March 2005 TAG teleconference)

RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG

Request for extension of the XRI review period

Review of "Storing Data in Documents"

RFC 2616 (rfc2616) - Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting

RSS feed for www-tag-announce (and all W3C public lists)

Status of issues/findings I 'own'

subject lines, binary xml [was: Draft minutes of 15 March 2005 Telcon]

Summary of TAG activity from 30 Oct 2004 to 22 Feb 2005

SWBPD WG Resolution Regarding httpRange-14

TAG accepts issue namespaceState-48

URN usage and arrangements

What do HTTP URIs Identify?

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2005 22:02:09 UTC