- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 19:03:29 +0100
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On Tuesday, March 22, 2005, 6:01:47 PM, Dan wrote:
DC> On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 14:50 +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>> Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> writes:
>>
>> > On Tuesday, March 22, 2005, 1:04:38 PM, Henry wrote:
>> >
>> > HST> GRDDL as currently implemented supports this, and allows for the
>> > HST> mapping to be stated on a per language basis via annotations in a
>> > HST> (RDF/W3C XML) Schema document
>> . . .
>> > I can see from the spec how to do this on a per instance level. Could
>> > you elaborate (or point to what I missed) on the per-language level?
>>
>> I should have given one more bit of information -- it's only the demo
>> GRDDL _implementation_ [1] that takes this extra step -- see the
>> second (RDF schema) and fourth (W3C XML Schema) examples there.
DC> I have thought of it as implicit in the spec too, but it's clearly
DC> too implicit. I hope to clarify soon...
Ok, thanks.
DC> There's a relevant section... in the editor's draft, at least...
DC> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#ns-bind
Yes, part of the problem is that I believed:
Latest Version:
http://www.w3.org/TR/grddl/
to be true. Its way off, in fact.
DC> The P3Q example is analagous to what I'm suggesting we should do
DC> for SVG, Chris...
DC> From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
DC> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 11:45:30 +0100
DC>
DC> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2004Feb/0002
DC> I'm torn between explaining it just for Chris and fixing
DC> the spec so it's clear enough for Chris and everybody else.
Dom, do the latter.
DC> I'm having trouble with time management around this task.
>> ht
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/grddl-xml-demo
--
Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org
Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Friday, 25 March 2005 18:03:31 UTC