Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting

Thanks Mark.  I had attempted to represent your position and apparently 
came close but didn't quite nail the details.

Mark Baker writes:

> (quoting the minutes...NRM)
> 
> ] So, I think Mark has fairly clearly stated that
> ] he wants the URI >only< at the HTTP level, not
> ] duplicated.

> Duplication is generally a bad idea IMO, so it
> would be nice that any solution avoid it.

I remembered your saying that before, and I apparently misquoted it as 
representing the net of your position.

> But my concern is just that the URI needs to make
> it to the application protocol envelope, and if
> duplication is required for that to happen, then
> that's fine by me.

Thank you for the clarification. 

FWIW, that's at least generally my position too.  Restating in my words: 
it's important to make at least a serious effort to properly use an 
"underlying" protocol such as HTTP.  Duplication has serious downsides, 
but also some advantages, and may be a reasonable compromise in some 
cases, perhaps this one.

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 4 March 2005 15:40:27 UTC