Re: C14N isn't widely used?

On Feb 24, 2005, at 1:46 PM, Elliotte Harold wrote:

>> I don't know of any XML signature library that implements c14n 
>> without also implementing exc-c14n.
>
> They're not exactly signature libraries, (There are uses for 
> canonicalization other than signatures, after all. I use it for 
> conformance testing) but XOM 1.0 and genx 1.0 implement canonical XML 
> but not exclusive canonical XML. XOM 1.1 will add support for 
> exclusive canonical XML.

I really must go back and ascertain what work would be involved in 
making Genx do excl-c14n.  -Tim

Received on Thursday, 3 March 2005 18:41:03 UTC