- From: Michael Mealling <michael@refactored-networks.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:06:46 -0500
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Which is one of the conclusions we came to in RFC 3305[1]. Yes,
attempting to create 'classes' of URIs was a bad idea in hindsight. But
there is still value in URNs as simply another URI scheme that has
features to it that other schemes don't.
On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 12:50 -0500, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
> Well, URIs were ... but the attempt to categorize them
> into URNs and URLs I never agreed with.
>
> I was curious about your thought of a stable,
> permanent arrangement that relied, for example,
> on joint W3C-ITU responsibility for the root?
> Or some other joint configuration?
>
> cheers,
> tony
[1] ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3305.txt
--
Michael Mealling Refactored Networks, LLC
CEO & President 1645 Old Hwy 41
Office: +1-678-581-9656 Suite 112, Box 138
Cell: +1-678-640-6884 Kennesaw, GA 30152
http://refactored-networks.com/
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:07:24 UTC