- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:10:44 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
At 18:02 22/03/05 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Actually, the Communiqué focussed quite a bit on putting the mapping hooks > > into the XML Schema for a namespace, and that seems to be exactly what's > > shown at [2]. So, it took 5 years, big deal! > >:) > >Aside from the time... it also involved going from a declarative mapping >to a turing-complete (procedural) solution, which isn't ideal, so the >declarative approaches should still be persued, or at least discussed. I think there may be a false dichotomy here, or at least some terminological confusion. In short, as I understand the term, "declarative" can be "Turing complete". I thought that was what XSLT (along with functional programming languages) actually achieves. Am I missing something here? #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 10:22:14 UTC