www-rdf-rules@w3.org from November 2003 by author

Adrian Walker

• Re: plain rules, please / possibly simplistic approach (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Shirky / Syllogisms / Semantic Web (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Non-monotonic (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Non-monotonic (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 13 November)

Alberto Reggiori

• Re: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Monday, 17 November)

Andrei Lopatenko

• Re: Non-monotonic (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Monday, 17 November)

Art.Barstow@nokia.com

• Nokia's comments on RDF Query Charter (v1.21) (Wednesday, 26 November)

Benjamin Grosof

• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Saturday, 15 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- Rules, vs. OWL alone, in Semantic Web Services (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter - here's a NEW whole DRAFT (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)
• here's a list of companies/organizations potentially interested Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Saturday, 8 November)

Bijan Parsia

• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Two Rule Charter thoughts (Tuesday, 18 November)

Bill de hÓra

• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Wednesday, 5 November)

Boley, Harold

• RE: "A Web of Rules": positional RuleML (Saturday, 29 November)
• RE: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released (Friday, 28 November)
• RE: Rules WG -- draft charter (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Sunday, 9 November)

Butler, Mark

• RE: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C wor k (Monday, 3 November)

Chris Wang

• The Second CFP: ICDAT 2004 (Monday, 24 November)
• CFP: ICDAT 2004 International Conference on Digital Archive Technologies (Monday, 17 November)

Damian Steer

• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Monday, 3 November)

Dan Brickley

• Re: here's a list of companies/organizations potentially interested Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Saturday, 8 November)
• Re: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Friday, 7 November)
• RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Friday, 7 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Wednesday, 5 November)
• SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Monday, 3 November)

Dan Connolly

• plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter - here's a NEW whole DRAFT (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Monday, 10 November)

Danny Ayers

• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Friday, 21 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Friday, 21 November)
• RE: Put/Get (was RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents) (Friday, 21 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Wednesday, 19 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Tuesday, 18 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Monday, 17 November)

Drew McDermott

• Re: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released (Sunday, 30 November)
• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Sunday, 30 November)
• Re: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: plain rules, please (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 25 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Monday, 24 November)
• Shirky article (Monday, 24 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Sunday, 16 November)
• Re: Non-monotonic (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Tuesday, 11 November)

Emmanuil Batsis (Manos)

• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• "A Web of Rules": positional RuleML (Thursday, 27 November)
• Re: SeRQL: new QL proposal + implementation result set format (Monday, 3 November)

Geoff Chappell

• RE: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Monday, 3 November)

Graham Klyne

• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Rules WG -- filling a much needed gap? (Tuesday, 11 November)

Graham Moore

• RE: Put/Get - RDF Net API (Tuesday, 25 November)

Harold Boley

• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Tuesday, 4 November)

Ian Horrocks

• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)

Jack Berkowitz

• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: AW: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Tuesday, 11 November)

Jeen Broekstra

• Re: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C wor k (Tuesday, 4 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Tuesday, 4 November)

Jim Hendler

• Put/Get (was RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents) (Thursday, 20 November)
• RE: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Friday, 14 November)
• RE: Rules WG -- draft charter (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- filling a much needed gap? (Tuesday, 11 November)
• RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Tuesday, 11 November)

jo walsh

• Re: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Tuesday, 4 November)

Jos De_Roo

• Re: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released (Sunday, 30 November)
• RE: Rules WG -- draft charter (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: here's a list of companies/organizations potentially interested Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Saturday, 8 November)

Joshua Allen

• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)

Mark Baker

• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Tuesday, 18 November)

Mike Dean

• Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released (Thursday, 20 November)

Minsu Jang

• RE: Non-monotonic (Friday, 14 November)
• RE: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 13 November)
• RE: here's a list of companies/organizations potentially interested Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)
• RE: here's a list of companies/organizations potentially interested Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Saturday, 8 November)

NMP-MSW/Tampere

• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Wednesday, 19 November)
• Re: Towards an RDF Query standard: some proposed minimum requirements (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Towards an RDF Query standard: some proposed minimum requirements (Tuesday, 18 November)

Patrick Stickler

• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Sunday, 23 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Friday, 21 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Monday, 10 November)
• One property to rule them all, one property to find them, one property to bring them all in and in the darkness bind them... ;-) (Friday, 7 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Thursday, 6 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Tuesday, 4 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Tuesday, 4 November)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: *****SPAM***** Re: plain rules, please / possibly simplistic approach (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: plain rules, please (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Monday, 17 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Monday, 10 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Monday, 10 November)

Raphael Volz

• AW: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Tuesday, 11 November)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Wednesday, 26 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Friday, 14 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 13 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Wednesday, 12 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Tuesday, 11 November)
• Rules WG -- draft charter (Friday, 7 November)

Seaborne, Andy

• RE: RDF Query -- possible WG charter draft for discussion (Tuesday, 11 November)
• RE: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C wor k (Wednesday, 5 November)
• RE: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C wor k (Tuesday, 4 November)
• RE: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C wor k (Tuesday, 4 November)

Sean Mehan

• Re: Non-monotonic (Friday, 14 November)

Stefan Decker

• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Friday, 21 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Thursday, 20 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)

Stephane Fellah

• RE: Non-monotonic (Friday, 14 November)

Stephen Reed

• Re: plain rules, please [was: Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) 0.5 released] (Tuesday, 25 November)

Steve Harris

• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C wor k (Tuesday, 4 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C wor k (Tuesday, 4 November)
• Re: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scopingRulesvsQueryinW3Cwork (Tuesday, 4 November)

Thomas B. Passin

• Re: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Wednesday, 19 November)

tim finin

• Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)

Wagner, G.R.

• RE: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Monday, 24 November)
• RE: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• RE: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF (Tuesday, 18 November)
• RE: Towards an RDF Query standard: some proposed minimum requirements (Tuesday, 18 November)
• RE: RDF query and Rules - my two cents (Tuesday, 11 November)
• RE: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Tuesday, 4 November)

Wolf Siberski

• RE: SeRQL an RDF rule language: scoping Rules vs Query in W3C work (Thursday, 6 November)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 November 2003 17:33:25 UTC