- From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:13:40 +0200
- To: jo walsh <jo@abduction.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-rules@w3.org>
On 2003-11-10 13:32, "ext jo walsh" <jo@abduction.org> wrote: > > > hello, > >> Here are a few requirements that I would expect to see spelled out >> explicitly in the charter, which were not so in the draft: >> 2. All implementations must support at least all of the pre-defined XML >> Schema simple datatypes. >> >> 3. Query results should be, by default, returned as RDF/XML, even if other >> forms of representation are made available by particular implementations. > > forgive any obvious stupidity from someone not deeply involved in the > process but i don't see the connection, utility or necessity that puts > these two 'requirements' at the start of an RDF query/rule language > standard effort. i feel wary of tight coupling to XML concepts in this > domain... > > that doesn't even amount to 2cents does it :/... I could see #2 being lessened to strong consideration and recommendation for implementations, rather than a hard requirement. But I think #3, for an RDF Query solution, is pretty reasonable, though it could perhaps be phrased more generically as "results by default should be returned in a standardized RDF serialization". Patrick > > jo > -- > "Common sense won't tell you. We have to tell each other." -DNA > > > > > >
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 08:15:56 UTC