- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:43:05 -0600
- To: Mike Dean <mdean@bbn.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 02:21, Mike Dean wrote: > Please direct comments to www-rdf-rules@w3.org. > [2] http://www.daml.org/2003/11/swrl/ "This syntax extends the abstract syntax of OWL". Why? I was expecting plain old horn rules. I don't see why all the terms and structures from OWL-DL are carried into SWRL. I prefer designs like RuleML Rules Lite Concrete Syntax September 30th, 2003 http://www.ruleml.org/submission/ruleslite/concretesyntax.html <- Renamed Update: CONCRETE SYNTAX FOR RULES LITE -> RULEML RULES LITE From: Harold Boley (boley@informatik.uni-kl.de) Date: 10/15/03 http://www.daml.org/listarchive/joint-committee/1490.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 25 November 2003 12:43:07 UTC