W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-rules@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Rules WG -- draft charter -- NAF

From: Stefan Decker <stefan@ISI.EDU>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 17:05:49 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: www-rdf-rules@w3.org


I forgot the answer one point.

>>Second, the RDF and RDFS CWA of any graph are going
>>to be OWL-inconsistent.

Yes, but you would not use the CWA in this way.
You would use CWA(OWL(A)), that means use the CWA to query the resulting 
graph, not
the other way round (OWL(CWA(A)) - I don't think OWL(CWA(A)) makes sense at 
all - at least I can not
think of a useful application.).

Received on Friday, 21 November 2003 12:09:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:46:16 UTC