- From: Damian Steer <pldms@mac.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:09:14 +0000
- To: www-rdf-rules@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com> writes: > On 2003-11-10 13:32, "ext jo walsh" <jo@abduction.org> wrote: > >> >> >> hello, >> >>> Here are a few requirements that I would expect to see spelled out >>> explicitly in the charter, which were not so in the draft: >>> 2. All implementations must support at least all of the pre-defined XML >>> Schema simple datatypes. >>> >>> 3. Query results should be, by default, returned as RDF/XML, even if other >>> forms of representation are made available by particular implementations. >> >> forgive any obvious stupidity from someone not deeply involved in the >> process but i don't see the connection, utility or necessity that puts >> these two 'requirements' at the start of an RDF query/rule language >> standard effort. i feel wary of tight coupling to XML concepts in this >> domain... >> >> that doesn't even amount to 2cents does it :/... > > > I could see #2 being lessened to strong consideration and recommendation > for implementations, rather than a hard requirement. > I see #2 being a concern given my experience of the strongly typed XPath 2.0/XSLT 2.0/XQuery versus the weakly typed XPath 1.0/XSLT 1.0. I certainly prefer your weakened revision, and agree datatypes need to be mentioned in the charter. Damian Steer PS maybe Jo + Me = 2cents :-) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE/r5wJAyLCB+mTtykRAueRAJ9o6GXS+x9WEaOpBUn96yYhnI+YyQCfWPMC 8DTp82vQVIugz1JeZIeZY/U= =NW5a -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 10 November 2003 09:09:01 UTC