- From: Joshua Allen <joshuaa@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 11:08:45 -0800
- To: "Danny Ayers" <danny666@virgilio.it>, "Patrick Stickler (NMP-MSW/Tampere)" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
- Cc: "Graham Klyne" <GK@ninebynine.org>, "Jim Hendler" <hendler@cs.umd.edu>, "Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>, <www-rdf-rules@w3.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> But despite the fact that we > > don't even have the slightest freekin' semblance of a consistent > > data-access architecture, > > We have the web. PUT/GET are a data-access architecture for documents, period. RDF is not a document data model; it's a graph data model. If you want to shim a document data model on top of your graph storage, then fine -- but you better figure out how to interact with your graph storage first. Until you have a consistent way of accessing your graph data model, you're going to have a post-babel chaos.
Received on Thursday, 20 November 2003 14:08:58 UTC