XBL 2.0 Disposition of Comments

Comment 1

Summary: Request for more examples.

Status: Agreed.

Comment 2

Summary: Typos in examples.

Status: Agreed.

Comment 3

Summary: Issues with namespace prefixes in selectors

Status: Disagreed with proposal of introducing new prefix declaration

Comment 4

Summary: Query regarding requirements for authoring tools

Status: Resolved as part of comment 11.

Comment 5

Summary: Use "fragment body" instead of "subtree" when definining "XBL subtree".

Status: Rejected on technical grounds.

Comment 6

Summary: Suggestions for a better abstract.

Status: Made some changes, though not all those suggested.

Comment 7

Summary: Suggestions for a better introduction.

Status: Rejected; the suggestions did not seem like improvements.

Comment 8

Summary: Comments regarding extensibility.

Status: Made some changes, though not all those suggested.

Comment 9

Summary: Comment regarding xml:id and request to get review from XMLCWG

Comment 10

Summary: Confusion about the definition of "shadow tree".

Status: Unclear how to proceed. Rejected pending further comment.

Comment 11

Summary: Request to define conformance classes.

Status: Accepted.

Comment 12

Summary: Request to define "expected context" and to use a schema language.

Status: Fixed text to avoid needing to define the term. Couldn't find

Comment 13

Summary: Request to change some element names.

Status: Rejected since current names were the result of a lot of time

Comment 14

Summary: Request to allow any implementation mechanism for parsing.

Status: Reviewer said the issue was on hold. Unclear how to proceed.

Comment 15

Summary: Request to split a paragraph in two.

Status: Agreed. Fixed that paragraph and a number of other ones.

Comment 16

Summary: Query about the "unless it has already been loaded" text.

Status: Query was based on misunderstanding. Clarified spec a little.

Comment 17

Summary: Comment regarding XML Events and request to work with HTMLWG

Status: Unclear how to proceed. Rejected pending further comment.

Comment 18

Summary: Suggestion not to use @namespace url() syntax.

Status: Rejected. Reviewer said the issue was on hold. Unclear how to

Comment 19

Summary: Question about the term "semantic-free XML element".

Status: Unclear how to proceed. Rejected pending further comment.

Comment 20

Summary: Request to clarify "do not support CSS".

Status: Rejected.

Comment 21

Summary: Editorial fix in xblSetInsertionPoint definition.

Status: Fixed.

Comment 22

Summary: are interfaces always implemented?

Status: Fixed.

Comment 23

Summary: Abstract changes.

Status: Fixed.

Comment 24

Summary: Confusion over the word "ignore"

Status: Fixed.