W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-appformats@w3.org > October 2006

Re: [XBL] XBL 2.0 Conformance requirements and Authoring Tools

From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 12:23:27 +0900
Message-Id: <B7EC516C-44D0-418D-A404-C4C8B64824F4@w3.org>
Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>

Le 6 oct. 06 à 10:08, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Karl Dubost wrote:
>> What I meant is
>> 	"Has the WG forgotten to address authoring tools or was it  
>> intentional
>> to not talk about them?"
>> Hope it helps to clarify the question.
> Oh! Yes this does indeed much clarify the question.
> No, I didn't forget about authoring tools. There just wasn't  
> anything to
> say about them. However, in response to one of your other comments  
> I've
> now explicitly mentioned them in the conformance section. Let me  
> know if
> that's ok.

Using the version in CVS
Searching for author in the conformance section doesn't give many  
answers except in
	"… but there really is no good reason to use that
	prefix in selectors, so authors are encouraged to
	avoid doing so."

Where do you explicitly mention them? or maybe not committed in CVS  
yet. Let me know when you have done it.


Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 03:23:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:56:16 UTC