- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:21:13 +0900
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@w3.org>, public-appformats@w3.org
Le 27 oct. 2006 à 06:31, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Karl Dubost wrote:
>> Le 26 oct. 2006 à 19:42, Dean Jackson a écrit :
>>> On 06/10/2006, at 9:06 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is the only extension mechanism allowed. Other extensions
>>>> would
>>>> make a UA non-conformant. Content that uses the mechanism described
>>>> above would be non-conformant. The only reason this is mentioned at
>>>> all is to avoid two implementations using the same attribute name
>>>> for that feature.
>>
>> I still think it is good to remind people in an Extension section.
>
> Ok, I've added an Extension Mechanisms section and removed the
> mention of
> the 'vendor-binary=""' attribute.
Thanks satisfied.
>>> The WG agree with what Ian says above. Karl, could you please
>>> respond
>>> to say whether you accept this or not?
>>
>> No traces here
>> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues
>
> The disposition of comments is at:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/disposition-of-
> comments
Thanks for the pointer.
That would be good if the WG could prepare an HTML version will help
certainly during the transition call.
See for example http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/lc-
replies.html
>> And I have checked in the minutes of the last F2F (24, 25, 26) and
>> I do not
>> see where it has been discussed by the WG.
>
> It was discussed here:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2006/10/26-waf-minutes.html#item02
>
> But in my opinion such discussions are irrelevant as they were not
> done in
> public, with open participation, and therefore should not be
> considered
> part of the work surrounding the XBL2 specification.
Hmmmm…
Here there is a problem wider than this issue. I may have to report
this at a higher level. It seems to be said, if I understood, that
the WAF WG decisions are irrelevant.
> "Please let us know if this does or does not satisfy your comment."
For this specific issue, yes.
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 00:21:52 UTC