- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 09:21:13 +0900
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@w3.org>, public-appformats@w3.org
Le 27 oct. 2006 à 06:31, Ian Hickson a écrit : > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Karl Dubost wrote: >> Le 26 oct. 2006 à 19:42, Dean Jackson a écrit : >>> On 06/10/2006, at 9:06 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: >>>> >>>> This is the only extension mechanism allowed. Other extensions >>>> would >>>> make a UA non-conformant. Content that uses the mechanism described >>>> above would be non-conformant. The only reason this is mentioned at >>>> all is to avoid two implementations using the same attribute name >>>> for that feature. >> >> I still think it is good to remind people in an Extension section. > > Ok, I've added an Extension Mechanisms section and removed the > mention of > the 'vendor-binary=""' attribute. Thanks satisfied. >>> The WG agree with what Ian says above. Karl, could you please >>> respond >>> to say whether you accept this or not? >> >> No traces here >> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/waf/issues > > The disposition of comments is at: > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/xbl2/disposition-of- > comments Thanks for the pointer. That would be good if the WG could prepare an HTML version will help certainly during the transition call. See for example http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/lc- replies.html >> And I have checked in the minutes of the last F2F (24, 25, 26) and >> I do not >> see where it has been discussed by the WG. > > It was discussed here: > > http://www.w3.org/2006/10/26-waf-minutes.html#item02 > > But in my opinion such discussions are irrelevant as they were not > done in > public, with open participation, and therefore should not be > considered > part of the work surrounding the XBL2 specification. Hmmmm… Here there is a problem wider than this issue. I may have to report this at a higher level. It seems to be said, if I understood, that the WAF WG decisions are irrelevant. > "Please let us know if this does or does not satisfy your comment." For this specific issue, yes. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 27 October 2006 00:21:52 UTC