Re: [XBL] XBL 2.0 Conformance requirements and examples

Le 6 oct. 06 à 09:11, Ian Hickson a écrit :
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 karl@w3.org wrote:
>>
>> It is always good to avoid to mix conformance requirements with  
>> examples
>> in the prose. At least, it is better to make a clear distinction. The
>> conformance section says it clearly but nonetheless create individual
>> paragraph for example. not like in [...]
>
> Fixed.

Thanks. Satisfied.

-- 
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
   QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
      *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***

Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 01:28:18 UTC