Re: [XBL] XBL 2.0 Conformance requirements and Authoring Tools

On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Karl Dubost wrote:
>
> What I meant is
> 	"Has the WG forgotten to address authoring tools or was it intentional
> to not talk about them?"
> 
> Hope it helps to clarify the question.

Oh! Yes this does indeed much clarify the question.

No, I didn't forget about authoring tools. There just wasn't anything to 
say about them. However, in response to one of your other comments I've 
now explicitly mentioned them in the conformance section. Let me know if 
that's ok.

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 01:08:50 UTC