Re: [XBL] XBL 2.0 Conformance requirements and Authoring Tools

On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 karl@w3.org wrote:
>
> Are there specific requirements for authoring tools that the WG didn't 
> think about? It's one of the reproaches made to W3C on a regular basis. 
> If there are such requirements, please say so. 

It isn't clear to me how we can mention comments that we didn't think 
about. We didn't think about them, by definition. Could you detail exactly 
what text you would like us to add which would satisfy your comment?

Cheers,
-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 22:23:09 UTC