- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:30:18 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
On Fri, 6 Oct 2006, Karl Dubost wrote: > > > > > > Has the WG forgotten to address authoring tools or was it > > > intentional to not talk about them? > > > > No, I didn't forget about authoring tools. There just wasn't anything > > to say about them. However, in response to one of your other comments > > I've now explicitly mentioned them in the conformance section. Let me > > know if that's ok. > > Where do you explicitly mention them? or maybe not committed in CVS yet. > Let me know when you have done it. 1.2 Conformance, paragraph 5: # Products that generate XBL subtrees cannot claim conformance to this # specification, though they can claim to only produce XBL subtrees that # themselves are conformant to this specification. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 22:30:33 UTC