- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 00:22:42 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
On Sat, 7 Oct 2006, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > > * Ian Hickson wrote: > >On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 karl@w3.org wrote: > >> > >># Similarly, XBL elements (other than the xbl element itself) that do not > >># have a correct xbl element as an ancestor are in error too, and UAs > >># must ignore them, treating them as they would any arbitrary > >># semantic-free XML element. > >> > >> What is a semantic-free XML element? There is no definition for this. > > > >It's an element that has no semantics. Where's the ambiguity? Why does > >this need a definition? The term is self-explanatory. > > I am not so sure about that. I cannot tell from the draft whether e.g. > > <?xml version='1.0'?> > <x> > <xbl:template ... xmlns:xbl='...' /> > </x> > > the template element implements the XBLTemplateElement interface. The > draft says "The XBLTemplateElement interface is implemented by template > elements that are in the XBL namespace" which suggests that yes, it does > implement it, but the text above suggests it does not implement it. I've tried to clarify this. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 11 October 2006 00:22:53 UTC