- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2006 01:02:09 +0000 (UTC)
- To: karl@w3.org
- Cc: public-appformats@w3.org
On Thu, 5 Oct 2006 karl@w3.org wrote: > ># Similarly, XBL elements (other than the xbl element itself) that do not ># have a correct xbl element as an ancestor are in error too, and UAs ># must ignore them, treating them as they would any arbitrary ># semantic-free XML element. > > What is a semantic-free XML element? There is no definition for this. It's an element that has no semantics. Where's the ambiguity? Why does this need a definition? The term is self-explanatory. > How does it differ in the processing for User agents? Differ from what? > What a user agent is supposed to do with something which is not s > semantic-free XML element? Whatever the element's semantics are defined as requiring the UA to do. I don't really understand the question here. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 6 October 2006 01:02:20 UTC