- From: <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 05:44:52 -0000
- To: public-appformats@w3.org
Hi, This is a QA Review comment for "XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0" http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/ 2006-06-19 Last Call WD About http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#terminology In the terminology of XML Fragment, an "XBL subtree" is defined as "fragment body" [[[ fragment body A well-balanced region of an XML document being considered as (logically and/or physically) separate from the rest of the document for the purposes of defining it as a fragment. Also, that part of a fragment entity that consists solely of the well-balanced region from the complete XML document. When it is important to indicate that a reference is specifically to the version of the fragment body still physically part of the originating (parent) document, this document will use the term “fragment body in situ.” ]]] -- XML Fragment Interchange http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-fragment#d1e275 Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:24:18 GMT The definition of XBL subtree is [[[ An XBL subtree is a subtree in an XML document (an XML instance), the subtree having as its root node an xbl element in the XBL namespace, which is used to define bindings. XBL subtrees can stand alone in XBL documents, or can be included in non-XBL documents. ]]] -- XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/#terminology Thu, 07 Sep 2006 13:43:53 GMT What about saying: An XBL subtree is a fragment body in an XML document… -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 05:45:33 UTC