public-w3process@w3.org from August 2014 by date

Sunday, 31 August 2014

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Jeff Jaffe
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Ian Hickson
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Steve Faulkner
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Jeff Jaffe

Friday, 29 August 2014

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec David Singer
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Ian Hickson
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Anne van Kesteren
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Anne van Kesteren
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Jeff Jaffe
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Julian Reschke
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Ian Hickson
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Ian Hickson

Thursday, 28 August 2014

Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Philippe Le Hegaret
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Chris Wilson
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Sylvain Galineau
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Marcos Caceres
Re: Proposing a new WG and appeal - Re: New Editor's draft Ian Jacobs
Re: First Draft of W3C version of URL Spec Jonas Sicking

Wednesday, 27 August 2014

Tuesday, 26 August 2014

RE: w3process-ISSUE-109 (Unreviewed Charter Extension): Should AC approval be required to extend a charter [Process Document] Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Re: w3process-ISSUE-109 (Unreviewed Charter Extension): Should AC approval be required to extend a charter [Process Document] Wayne Carr
Re: w3process-ISSUE-109 (Unreviewed Charter Extension): Should AC approval be required to extend a charter [Process Document] Wayne Carr
Re: w3process-ISSUE-109 (Unreviewed Charter Extension): Should AC approval be required to extend a charter [Process Document] David Singer
Re: w3process-ISSUE-109 (Unreviewed Charter Extension): Should AC approval be required to extend a charter [Process Document] Arthur Barstow
w3process-ISSUE-123 (FirstMeetingDateForWG): Date of the first face-to-face meeting.of a newly chartered WG [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-122 (WhoBenefits): What community is expected to benefit from this Activity? [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-121 (IPinforInCharters): Intellectual property information.in charters [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-120 (LevelOfMembeEffort): threshold level of effort that Members are expected to pledge [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-119 (CharterScope): Description of the Activity/Charter's scope [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-118 (ContextInformation): Context Informaton in Activity Proposals [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-117 (ActivityAppealDissent): Requirement for dissent in the AC Review of an Activity Proposal to Appeal an approval [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-116 (CharterAnnoucement): Announcing a Working Group Charter [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-115 (ActivityStatementRevision): Revising the Activity Statement for each Activity every 6 months Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-114 (CharterExtensionReview): Review period for charter extensions Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-113: Advisory Committee Review of Charter Extentions [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-112: Remove Activity Proposals [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-111 (CharterInterest): W3C creates a charter based on interest from the Members and Team [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-110: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Reminder: Restarting Process Task Force Telcons on 26 August Stephen Zilles

Monday, 25 August 2014

Re: voting simple illustration David Singer
Reminder: Restarting Process Task Force Telcons on 26 August Stephen Zilles
Re: voting simple illustration timeless@gmail.com
Re:voting simple illustration chaals@yandex-team.ru
Proposing a new WG and appeal - Re: New Editor's draft Wayne Carr
Re: voting simple illustration David Singer
Re:voting simple illustration chaals@yandex-team.ru
Re: voting simple illustration timeless@gmail.com
Re: voting simple illustration David Singer
Re:voting simple illustration chaals@yandex-team.ru

Saturday, 23 August 2014

Restarting Process Task Force Telcons on 26 August Stephen Zilles

Thursday, 21 August 2014

Re: voting simple illustration David Singer
voting simple illustration Brian Kardell

Tuesday, 19 August 2014

If "Activity" overview type docs went away, would anyone notice? Arthur Barstow
w3process-ISSUE-109 (Unreviewed Charter Extension): Should AC approval be required to extend a charter [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-108 (Activity updates): Continue requiring updated information on work every six months? [Dashboard] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Diff - stripping activities Charles McCathie Nevile

Friday, 15 August 2014

Scheduling Process Task Force Telcons Stephen Zilles
RE: Process document feedback locations Stephen Zilles

Thursday, 14 August 2014

Re: Process document feedback locations Arthur Barstow
Process document feedback locations timeless@gmail.com
Please remove `process-issues` from the Process document timeless@gmail.com
Re: Feedback on Process-20140801 section 5 Charles McCathie Nevile
New Editor's draft Charles McCathie Nevile
Re: Feedback on Process-20140801 section 14 Charles McCathie Nevile

Wednesday, 13 August 2014

Re: World Wide Web Consortium Process Document 14 October 2005 Ian Jacobs
World Wide Web Consortium Process Document 14 October 2005 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 14 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 13 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 12 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 11 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 10 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 11 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 10 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 9 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 8 timeless@gmail.com
Re: Feedback on Process-20140801 section 5 Karl Dubost
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 6 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 5 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 4 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 3 timeless@gmail.com

Tuesday, 12 August 2014

Feedback on Process-20140801 section 2 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 1 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 15 timeless@gmail.com
Feedback on Process-20140801 section 7 timeless@gmail.com
Re: Consolidate process related issue tracking? Charles McCathie Nevile
Consolidate process related issue tracking? Arthur Barstow

Monday, 11 August 2014

RE: Voting experiment GALINDO Virginie

Sunday, 10 August 2014

Re: w3process-ISSUE-107 (cc0-or-cc-by): Need a CC0 or CC-by license [Process Document] Charles McCathie Nevile

Friday, 8 August 2014

Re: RE : RE : Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
RE : RE : Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed GALINDO Virginie
w3process-ISSUE-107 (cc0-or-cc-by): Need a CC0 or CC-by license [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
w3process-ISSUE-106 (TR-graveyard): The graveyard of /TR [Process Document] Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker
Re: RE : Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Robin Berjon
RE : Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed GALINDO Virginie
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Robin Berjon
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Robin Berjon
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Robin Berjon
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Jay Kishigami
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Sylvain Galineau
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed David Singer

Thursday, 7 August 2014

Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Sylvain Galineau
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed David Singer
Re: Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]] JC
Re: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015) JC
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed JC
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Sylvain Galineau
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Brian Kardell
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed David Singer
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Olivier Thereaux
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed David Singer
RE: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Domenic Denicola
Re: Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]] Marcos Caceres
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Arthur Barstow
Re: Overall structure of the W3C Arthur Barstow
Re: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015) Arthur Barstow
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Olivier Thereaux
RE : Overall structure of the W3C GALINDO Virginie
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Karl Dubost
Re: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015) Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié
Re: Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]] Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié

Tuesday, 5 August 2014

Monday, 4 August 2014

Re: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015) David Singer
Re: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015) Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Re: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015) Arthur Barstow
RE: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015) Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
RE: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015) Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Re: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015) Arthur Barstow
Re: Open and Transparent W3C Community Group Proposed David Singer
RE: Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]] GALINDO Virginie

Friday, 1 August 2014

Re: Overall structure of the W3C Kai Scheppe

Saturday, 2 August 2014

Re: Overall structure of the W3C Karl Dubost

Friday, 1 August 2014

Re: Overall structure of the W3C Nottingham, Mark
RE: Overall structure of the W3C Michael Champion (MS OPEN TECH)
Re: Overall structure of the W3C David Singer
Re: Proposal to create Public list for the AB [Was: Re: w3process-ISSUE-104 (AB-transparency): AB should conduct all non-sensitive e-mail on a Public or Member list [Advisory Board]] Jean-Charles (JC) Verdié
Re: Overall structure of the W3C Wayne Carr
Re: Overall structure of the W3C Jeff Jaffe
Re: Overall structure of the W3C Jeff Jaffe
Re: Overall structure of the W3C Robin Berjon
Re: Overall structure of the W3C Charles McCathie Nevile
Re: Overall structure of the W3C GALINDO Virginie
Re: Overall structure of the W3C Daniel Appelquist
Re: Overall structure of the W3C Robin Berjon
Overall structure of the W3C Nottingham, Mark

Last message date: Sunday, 31 August 2014 21:43:42 UTC