Re: Request for Comments: proposed priorities for the Advisory Board (2014-2015)

When did the switch to "public" lists for that kind of discussions has
been discussed/approved at the AB? Could you point us to minutes of this
discussion?

Regards
JC

Arthur Barstow wrote:
> [ Bcc: w3c-ac-forum; public-openw3c ]
> 
> On 7/9/14 8:54 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> The Advisory Board created a huge list of its potential "priorities"
>> for 2014-2015. If you have any comments, please send them to this list
>> by July 18 at the latest:
>>
>> <https://www.w3.org/wiki/AB/2014-2015_Priorities>
>>
>> I am especially interested in priority ranking type data (f.ex.
>> High/Medium/Low/No priority) as well as other important areas/topics
>> that are missing.
> 
> (Sorry for the late feedback but I was OOO for the last two weeks).
> 
> The areas I intend to expend some level of energy are (in order as
> presented in version [1]):
> 
> * Consortium priorities; maximizing resource usage
> 
> * What are the most important priorities for the Web and W3C
> 
> * Member survey as well as a Public survey
> 
> * Long-term financial stability
> 
> * Membership fee reduction
> 
> * The "graveyard of TR"
> 
> * Broader industry collaboration on the Open Web Platform
> 
> * Best Practices that enable making standards consistent from a
> technical and strategic point of view
> 
> Re items related to updating Consortium processes, I consider
> changes/hacks to the Process Document (PD) mostly "make work" unless
> they are directly related to addressing the issues above. For example,
> only make changes that substantially reduce the amount of resources
> needed to support the Consortium's activities.
> 
> Comments on the above are of course welcome and encouraged but for
> Public replies, rather than use public-w3process, I think the new
> public-openw3C list [2] is more appropriate.
> 
> -AB
> 
> [1]
> <https://www.w3.org/wiki/index.php?title=AB/2014-2015_Priorities&oldid=75220>
> 
> [2] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-openw3c/>
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 7 August 2014 06:40:17 UTC