- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 14:26:17 -0700
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
- Cc: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Aug 26, 2014, at 5:58 , Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/19/14 8:59 AM, Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> should we require an AC review or approval to extend a charter (sometimes, always, more than X amount of time)? > > Seems like it would be mostly `make work` to have a formal AC review if the length (of a WG's charter extension) is relatively short. As such, a formal AC review of a charter extension should only be done if the extension is on the long-ish side, say 6+ months. I also think we can trust that the staff will push back on repeated extensions without review. However, would it be prudent to have a suggestion at least that charters be formally reviewed once the extensions have got to a certain length (e.g. 1 year, 1.5 years)? David Singer Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 21:26:47 UTC