Re: w3process-ISSUE-109 (Unreviewed Charter Extension): Should AC approval be required to extend a charter [Process Document] from Arthur Barstow on 2014-08-26 (public-w3process@w3.org from August 2014)

From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:58:41 -0400
To: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <53FC8481.9020503@gmail.com>

On 8/19/14 8:59 AM, Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker 
wrote:
> should we require an AC review or approval to extend a charter (sometimes, always, more than X amount of time)?

Seems like it would be mostly `make work` to have a formal AC review if 
the length (of a WG's charter extension) is relatively short. As such, a 
formal AC review of a charter extension should only be done if the 
extension is on the long-ish side, say 6+ months.

Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 12:58:30 UTC