w3process-ISSUE-114 (CharterExtensionReview): Review period for charter extensions from Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker on 2014-08-26 (public-w3process@w3.org from August 2014)

From: Revising W3C Process Community Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 04:48:57 +0000
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1XM8gj-0008Iw-O2@stuart.w3.org>

w3process-ISSUE-114 (CharterExtensionReview): Review period for charter extensions

http://www.w3.org/community/w3process/track/issues/114

Raised by: Steve Zilles
On product: 

Section 5.2 Advisory Committee Review of an Activity Proposal has the following,
"The review period [for an Activity extension] MUST be at least four weeks."

Issue: Keep four week requirement for charter review (probably yes)?

Suggested Resolution:
Charter extensions should not be given an AC Review, but should be appealable by AC Members. This makes the lenght of the Review period moot. If AC Review is desired, then 4 weeks [the normal AC review period timing] is the correct time.

Received on Tuesday, 26 August 2014 04:48:58 UTC