Wednesday, 31 August 2011
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Spec update with vocabulary expansion
- Telecon Agenda - September 1st 2011, 1400 UTC
Tuesday, 30 August 2011
- Re: Modified proposal for 'provenance triple', ISSUE-110
- Re: Modified proposal for 'provenance triple', ISSUE-110
Monday, 29 August 2011
Saturday, 27 August 2011
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
Friday, 26 August 2011
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re 2: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (ISSUE-106)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 25th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Fwd: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (was Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand)
- Fwd: use of itemref
- Re: use of itemref
- Re: use of itemref
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (was Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand)
Thursday, 25 August 2011
- Re: The 'provenance' discussion...
- Re: The 'provenance' discussion...
- Re: use of itemref
- Re: Updated Core's Overview-src.html...
- Re: use of itemref
- Updated Core's Overview-src.html...
- The 'provenance' discussion...
- Re: use of itemref
- ISSUE-110: Should RDFa Processor output a triple for the source of a graph?
- ISSUE-109: Resolve differences terminology for 'default graph' and 'output graph'.
- use of itemref
- ISSUE-108: Refine/deprecate Link relations for the RDFa 1.1 Default Profile.
- ISSUE-107: Determine if @src attribute should be viewed in the object position instead of the subject position.
- ISSUE-106: Should RDFa support the creation of ordered lists?
- ISSUE-105: Should RDFa support something like Microdata's @itemref attribute.
- ISSUE-104: Determine if RDFa should normatively state that <link> and <meta> elements are supported in flow content.
- small changes on the core document
- Re: Spec update with vocabulary expansion
- Spec update with vocabulary expansion
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (was Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand)
- Re: Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (was Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand)
- Attempt for a List specification in RDFa (was Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand)
- Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand
Tuesday, 23 August 2011
- Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand
- Re: Plain vs. xsd:string literals in RDFa
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 25th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 25th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 25th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Telecon Agenda - August 25th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: Plain vs. xsd:string literals in RDFa
- Resource type issue (Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand)
- Re: Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand
- Re: Bug in RDF Distiller
Monday, 22 August 2011
- Suggestions for rdf:List and a value type shorthand
- Plain vs. xsd:string literals in RDFa
- Re: Bug in RDF Distiller
Sunday, 21 August 2011
Saturday, 20 August 2011
Thursday, 18 August 2011
- Re: ISSUE-102 (@prefix limit): Should @prefix be limited to HTML, HEAD and BODY? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
- Re: ISSUE-102 (@prefix limit): Should @prefix be limited to HTML, HEAD and BODY? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 18th 2011, 1400 UTC
- Re: Telecon Agenda - August 18th 2011, 1400 UTC
Wednesday, 17 August 2011
Tuesday, 16 August 2011
Monday, 15 August 2011
Sunday, 14 August 2011
- Re: Updated RDFa Core Editor's Draft
- Updated RDFa Core Editor's Draft
- Re: Removing @profile processing from RDFa Core
- Removing @profile processing from RDFa Core
Thursday, 11 August 2011
- Re: ISSUE-101 (xsd:string coercion): Should xsd:string values be coerced to plain literals? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
- ISSUE-103 (preserve @vocab declarations): Should RDFa Processors preserve @vocab declarations in the default graph? [RDFa 1.1 Core]
- ISSUE-102 (@prefix limit): Should @prefix be limited to HTML, HEAD and BODY? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
- ISSUE-101 (xsd:string coercion): Should xsd:string values be coerced to plain literals? [LC Comment - RDFa Core 1.1]
- Call for Exclusions (Update): RDF Interfaces 1.0
- Small modification proposal on my proposal...
Wednesday, 10 August 2011
- Re 2: PROPOSAL: Restrict @prefix declaration to the root element
- Re 2: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- Telecon Agenda - August 11th 2011, 1400 UTC
Tuesday, 9 August 2011
Friday, 5 August 2011
- Re: Re 2: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- Re: Re 2: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- Re: Re 2: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- Re: Re 2: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- Re: Re 2: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- Re 2: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- Re: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
Thursday, 4 August 2011
- Re: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- Re: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- Re: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature
- RDF Web Apps WG telecon canceled
Wednesday, 3 August 2011
Tuesday, 2 August 2011
- thoughts on the profile issue
- Re: PROPOSAL: Restrict @prefix declaration to the root element
- Re: Should RDFa 1.1 xsd:strings be coerced to plain literals?