- From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 17:39:52 +0200
- To: public-rdfa-wg <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi all, just a heads-up regarding the lexical space of CURIEorURI as we previously resolved. Users of RDFa who wish to use the "geo:" protocol [1] for URIs in @about or @resource have to take care so that the "geo:" prefix is not defined. I recall that it's been suggested to predefine this as a prefix for <http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#> (as is recommended in the documentation for this vocabulary [2]). That would obviously be problematic. (Of course, the merit of this protocol can be debated. I don't know how popular it is, but since it's an RFC (albeit a "proposed standard"), I take it must not be ignored.) Best regards, Niklas [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5870 [2]: http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/
Received on Saturday, 20 August 2011 15:40:43 UTC