W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdfa-wg@w3.org > August 2011

Re: More specific proposal on the vocabulary expansion (a.k.a. vocab proxy) feature

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2011 09:15:40 +0200
Cc: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C6F4CC42-309E-4DD3-833E-6FD03F3D035B@w3.org>
To: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>

On Aug 4, 2011, at 22:38 , Gregg Kellogg wrote:

> On Aug 4, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Ivan Herman wrote:
> 
>> Gregg,
>> 
>> I will look at it tomorrow, it is a bit too late for me here. But, I presume, when you use the term 'member submission' it is not like a 'real' W3C member submission
>> 
>> http://www.w3.org/Submission/
>> 
>> but simply a text for the RDFa specification, right?
> 
> Perhaps Member Submission is the wrong document type,

We need an ontology:-)

> what would be a more appropriate document type to use in ReSpec.js?
> 

A decision the group has to take is whether whatever we spec here is part of the overall RDFa Recommendation or not.

- If it is, then it is an editorial question whether the text would become part of the current RDFa 1.1 Core or whether we want to keep it a separate document.
- If it is not, then formally the end result will be a W3C Working Group Note.

Now... if we decide to, eventually, put this section into RDFa 1.1 Core that the document is a purely transitory one and will have to be picked up by the RDFa 1.1. Core editor for a merge. If the goal is a separate document, whether a recommendation or a note, then this document is, for now, a Working Group Working Draft, with the status somehow saying what the goal is.

_Personally_ I believe this should become part of RDFa 1.1 Core. But, again, this is something the group ought to decide.


>> Why using github and not our usual place to edit things, like our wiki page or our CVS space? It becomes a bit complicated if our different documents are spread all over the place...
> 
> It came up in discussion for Manu. I can work on it anyplace, you guys decide.

Because all other documents we edit are in CVS space, I would prefer to keep it there, too (if this was a new group, I would consider using mercurial because people seem to feel more comfortable with it, but we are passed that by now). If we go that way, I would need 

- your (meaning yours and Niklas'!) W3C account name
- an ssh public key

and I will then ask the system team to give you access to the CVS branch of the RDFa group.

Sorry to be a bit administrative here, but this is my job:-(

Ivan



> 
>> Not that it is sooo important, of course, just to organize ourselves...;-)
>> 
>>> ...
> 
> Gregg
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Friday, 5 August 2011 07:13:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:19:52 UTC