public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from October 2008 by date

Friday, 31 October 2008

• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Toby A Inkster
• Response Request For SVG 1.2 Tiny Comments Doug Schepers
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Svante Schubert
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Svante Schubert
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Svante Schubert
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Svante Schubert
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Svante Schubert
• RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property.. Svante Schubert
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 30 October 2008, 1500 UTC Mark Birbeck

Thursday, 30 October 2008

• meeting record: 2008-10-30 RDF-in-XHTML Task Force Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 30 October 2008, 1500 UTC Steven Pemberton
• Re: life after REC [external mechanism to add implicit triples] Ralph R. Swick
• RE: Telecon Agenda - 30 October 2008, 1500 UTC Hausenblas, Michael

Wednesday, 29 October 2008

• Telecon Agenda - 30 October 2008, 1500 UTC Ben Adida

Monday, 27 October 2008

• Agenda item Steven Pemberton
• Re: RDFa spec + XML Schema Shane McCarron
• Re: life after REC Steven Pemberton
• Re: RDFa spec + XML Schema Ivan Herman

Friday, 24 October 2008

• RDFa spec + XML Schema Steven Pemberton
• Re: life after REC: Meeting Agenda 1500 UTC Thursday October 23rd. Ivan Herman
• Re: life after REC: Meeting Agenda 1500 UTC Thursday October 23rd. Shane McCarron

Thursday, 23 October 2008

• Re: life after REC: Meeting Agenda 1500 UTC Thursday October 23rd. Toby A Inkster
• Re: life after REC: Meeting Agenda 1500 UTC Thursday October 23rd. Ben Adida
• RE: life after REC: Meeting Agenda 1500 UTC Thursday October 23rd. Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: life after REC: Meeting Agenda 1500 UTC Thursday October 23rd. Ivan Herman
• Re: life after REC: Meeting Agenda 1500 UTC Thursday October 23rd. Manu Sporny
• life after REC: Meeting Agenda 1500 UTC Thursday October 23rd. Ben Adida
• Announcing Oomph: A Microformats Toolkit Manu Sporny

Friday, 17 October 2008

• Re: RDFa is a W3C Recommendation Niklas Lindström

Thursday, 16 October 2008

• Re: RDFa is a W3C Recommendation Sergey Chernyshev
• RE: RDFa is a W3C Recommendation Breslin, John
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: regrets Simone Onofri
• Re: regrets Steven Pemberton
• Re: RDFa is a W3C Recommendation Simone Onofri
• Re: RDFa is a W3C Recommendation David Peterson
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Ed Summers
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Ed Summers

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

• Re: RDFa is a W3C Recommendation Dan Brickley
• RDFa is a W3C Recommendation Ralph R. Swick
• regrets Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa in Drupal core David Peterson

Tuesday, 14 October 2008

• Re html5 and metadata [Fwd: Fwd: Accessibility of <audio> and <video>] Dan Brickley

Monday, 13 October 2008

• Re: suggested new test case Mark Birbeck
• suggested new test case Toby A Inkster
• Re: RDFa review ... too late, but maybe still helpful for the group Mark Birbeck

Saturday, 11 October 2008

• Re: [LC] Official SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from W3C RDF in XHTML Task Force (ISSUE-2099) Ivan Herman
• Re: should SVG 1.2T extensible metadata attributes be of type CURIE? Doug Schepers

Friday, 10 October 2008

• Re: [LC] Official SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from W3C RDF in XHTML Task Force (ISSUE-2099) Doug Schepers
• should SVG 1.2T extensible metadata attributes be of type CURIE? Al Gilman
• Re: [LC] Official SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from W3C RDF in XHTML Task Force (ISSUE-2099) Dan Brickley
• Re: [LC] Official SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from W3C RDF in XHTML Task Force (ISSUE-2099) Doug Schepers
• Re: [LC] Official SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from W3C RDF in XHTML Task Force (ISSUE-2101) Doug Schepers
• Re: [LC] Official SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from W3C RDF in XHTML Task Force (ISSUE-2100) Doug Schepers
• Re: Treatment of RDFa in TAG Finding on Self-describing Web and feed back on RDFa in XHTML1.1 Ben Adida
• Re: [1.2T LC] WAI-ARIA use of @role as discussed under 'extensible metadata attributes' (ISSUE-2074) Manu Sporny
• Re: New RDFa test case: handling xml entities Toby A Inkster
• New RDFa test case: handling xml entities Ivan Herman
• Re: [DRAFT] SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from RDF in XHTML Task Force Manu Sporny
• Re: [LC] Official SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from W3C RDF in XHTML Task Force (ISSUE-2097) Doug Schepers
• [LC] Official SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from W3C RDF in XHTML Task Force Manu Sporny

Thursday, 9 October 2008

• Re: [DRAFT] SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from RDF in XHTML Task Force Mark Birbeck
• [DRAFT] SVG Tiny Working Draft Comments from RDF in XHTML Task Force Manu Sporny
• meeting record: 2008-10-09 RDFa Task Force telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Vocab document fixed Shane McCarron
• Re: Vocab document fixed Shane McCarron
• Re: Primer, and regrets for tomorrow Ralph R. Swick
• Re: Vocab document fixed Ivan Herman
• Vocab document fixed Steven Pemberton
• Re: Late notice: RDFa in SVG 1.2 'tiny' Dan Brickley
• Re: Treatment of RDFa in TAG Finding on Self-describing Web and feed back on RDFa in XHTML1.1 Julian Reschke
• Telecon agenda - 9 October 2008, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Re: Treatment of RDFa in TAG Finding on Self-describing Web and feed back on RDFa in XHTML1.1 Dean Edridge
• Late notice: RDFa in SVG 1.2 'tiny' Steven Pemberton
• Re: Treatment of RDFa in TAG Finding on Self-describing Web and feed back on RDFa in XHTML1.1 Julian Reschke
• Re: Treatment of RDFa in TAG Finding on Self-describing Web and feed back on RDFa in XHTML1.1 Dean Edridge
• RE: Primer, and regrets for tomorrow Hausenblas, Michael

Wednesday, 8 October 2008

• Primer, and regrets for tomorrow Ben Adida
• ISSUE-186: Last Call Comment: Mappings SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-185: Last Call Comment: Order in Classification Systems SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-184: Last Call Comment: Notation and prefLabel overlap SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-183: Last Call Comment: Class-Topic relationships SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-182: Last Call Comment: Index Terms SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-181: Last Call Comment: Non Assignable Concepts SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-180: Last Call Comment: PFWG: skosxl:Label class SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-179: Last Call Comment: PFWG: Lexical Labels SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-178: Last Call Comment: PFWG: Semantic Relations SWD Issue Tracker
• Re: RDFa review ... too late, but maybe still helpful for the group Axel Polleres
• Re: RDFa review ... too late, but maybe still helpful for the group Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa review ... too late, but maybe still helpful for the group Ben Adida

Tuesday, 7 October 2008

• ISSUE-177: Last Call Comment: Labelling Normative Material SWD Issue Tracker
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Steven Pemberton
• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Azamat

Monday, 6 October 2008

• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Toby A Inkster
• RDFa review ... too late, but maybe still helpful for the group Axel Polleres
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Jonathan Rees
• RE: "the main thing described by this document" (was lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Harry Halpin
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Pat Hayes
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Pat Hayes
• ISSUE-176: Last Call Comment: Mapping vocabulary constraints SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-175: Last Call Comment: SKOS namespace change question II SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-174: Last Call Comment: Cycles and skos:closeMatch SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-173: Last Call Comment: Section 9.6.4 SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-172: Last Call Comment: Well Formed Lists SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-171: Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-170: Last Call Comment: Language Tags II SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-169: Last Call Comment: BCP Reference SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-168: Last Call Comment: Language Tags SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-167: Last Call Comment: Application Behaviour re. Top Concepts SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-166: Last Call Comment: Turtle Notation II SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-165: Last Call Comment: Reference to RDF Concepts SWD Issue Tracker
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Steven Pemberton
• Re: "the main thing described by this document" (was lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Dan Brickley
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Dan Brickley
• Re: "the main thing described by this document" (was lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Steven Pemberton
• Re: "the main thing described by this document" (was lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Dan Brickley
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Steven Pemberton
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Steven Pemberton
• Re: "the main thing described by this document" (was lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Steven Pemberton
• Re: meeting record: 2008-10-02 RDFa Telecon Steven Pemberton
• Re: Treatment of RDFa in TAG Finding on Self-describing Web and feed back on RDFa in XHTML1.1 Steven Pemberton

Saturday, 4 October 2008

• ISSUE-164: Extension vs mapping (SKOS Primer) SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-163: Note on transitivity (SKOS Primer) SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-162: SKOS specialisation in SKOS Reference SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-161: Argument on KOS purposes in SKOS Reference SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-160: Allowing collections in semantic relationships SWD Issue Tracker
• Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 Sw-MetaPortal-ProjectParadigm

Friday, 3 October 2008

• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Richard Cyganiak
• RE: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Dan Brickley
• RE: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
• RE: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Steven Pemberton
• RE: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
• Comment on RDFa Primer concerning attributes @resource, @content and @datatype Michael Schneider
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Steven Pemberton
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Steven Pemberton
• Re: Comments on PR-rdfa-syntax-20080904 Danny Ayers
• Re: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Dan Brickley
• Re: Treatment of RDFa in TAG Finding on Self-describing Web and feed back on RDFa in XHTML1.1 Julian Reschke
• RE: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
• Re: Treatment of RDFa in TAG Finding on Self-describing Web and feed back on RDFa in XHTML1.1 Dean Edridge

Thursday, 2 October 2008

• Re: RDFa in Drupal core Damian Steer
• Re: RDFa in Drupal core Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa in Drupal core Toby A Inkster
• ISSUE-159: PR Comment: RDFa CURIE prefixes containing \"xml\" SWD Issue Tracker
• meeting record: 2008-10-02 RDFa Telecon Ralph R. Swick
• Re: RDFa in Drupal core Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa in Drupal core David Peterson
• Re: telecon agenda - 2 October 2008, 1500 UTC Shane McCarron
• Re: telecon agenda - 2 October 2008, 1500 UTC David Peterson
• RE: telecon agenda - 2 October 2008, 1500 UTC Hausenblas, Michael
• Re: telecon agenda - 2 October 2008, 1500 UTC Mark Birbeck
• ISSUE-158: Turtle Notation SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-157: SKOS and OWL 2 analysis SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-156: SKOS Notations and Datatypes SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-155: SKOS in OWL 2 SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-154: Formality in SKOS Reference SWD Issue Tracker
• RE: telecon agenda - 2 October 2008, 1500 UTC Hausenblas, Michael
• ISSUE-153: Last Call Comment: SKOS namespace change question SWD Issue Tracker
• telecon agenda - 2 October 2008, 1500 UTC Ben Adida

Wednesday, 1 October 2008

• ISSUE-152: Last Call Comment: Prefix for extension labels SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-150: Last Call Comment: Subsumption hierarchies SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-149: Last Call Comment: Asymmetric associations SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-148: Last Call Comment: Irreflexive and noncyclical hierarchies SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-147: Last Call Comment: Notations as plain literals SWD Issue Tracker
• RE: lcsh.info RDFa SKOS and content negotiation - use of RDF-style # IDs in RDFa? Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)
• Re: Regrets for Thursday telecon Simone Onofri

Last message date: Friday, 31 October 2008 22:37:08 UTC