- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:46:55 +0200
- To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 06:47:27 UTC
Manu Sporny wrote: > Ben Adida wrote: >> If possible, spend a few minutes determining critical pieces you'd like >> us to address as a group. If nothing, then nothing, but if something >> important, let's discuss. > > Here are a couple that will affect adoption of RDFa outside of XHTML: > > 1. Determining the correct use of @prefix for specifying CURIEs. Very much so! My personal take @prefix="pref1 uri1 pref1 uri1 pref1 uri1" it has exactly the same semantics as the xmlns:pref1="uri1" on a specific element. If the same pref is used both within a @prefix and xmlns, there should be a priority on which one wins (we should toss a coin:-) > 2. #include-like feature for specifying inclusion of vocabulary > documents (possibly via @prefix). > 3. A method for specifying reserved words in vocabulary documents which > are then used by RDFa parsers. > 4. Use of the above three items for supporting Microformats-like markup. > > -- manu > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Thursday, 23 October 2008 06:47:27 UTC