- From: Ralph R. Swick <swick@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:12:31 -0400
- To: "Steven Pemberton" <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>, <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
At 11:24 AM 10/27/2008 +0100, Steven Pemberton wrote: ... >5. Use of an external mechanism to add implicit rdfa, rather than having >to add explicit attributes: > > <dl class="familytree"> > <dt>Steven Pemberton</dt> > <dd><dl> > <dt>Astrid Kerssens</dt> > <dd><dl> > <dt>Julian Pemberton-Kerssens</dt> > <dd></dd> > <dt>Lucien Pemberton-Kerssens</dt> > <dd></dd> > </dl> > </dd> > </dl> > </dd> > </dl> > >I would like to generate triples including > > "Steven Pemberton" genealogy:partner "Astrid Kerssens" > "Steven Pemberton" genealogy:parent "Julian Pemberton-Kerssens" > etc. GRDDL is exactly suited to this example, no? a) the structure in your example is concise b) the structure in your example could be used for a wide variety of relationships c) it may be unwise for RDFa V.n to pick a single semantics for nested lists So, you write (or reuse someone else's) custom [GRDDL] transform for this particular markup style.
Received on Thursday, 30 October 2008 13:13:16 UTC