- From: Azamat <abdoul@cytanet.com.cy>
- Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 11:13:14 +0300
- To: "Toby A Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Cc: "'SW-forum'" <semantic-web@w3.org>, <metadataportals@yahoo.com>, <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Toby, I wonder why all taxonomic groups are under the property heading instead of the class heading. Thanks. Azamat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Toby A Inkster" <tai@g5n.co.uk> To: <metadataportals@yahoo.com> Cc: <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>; "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 1:08 AM Subject: Re: Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1 > > On 4 Oct 2008, at 02:41, Sw-MetaPortal-ProjectParadigm wrote: > >> Check out www.ubio.org and review the underlying structure. Use this and >> contact the developers network to expand the biological taxonomy >> vocabulary. > > Thanks for the information. I'll try to get in touch with them soon. As > it happens, today I've pushed a few changes across from my working copy > to the live vocab: > > http://purl.org/NET/biol/ns# > > These changes make biol:hasTaxonomy into a sub-property of rdf:type and > biol:Taxonomy a sub-class of rdfs:Class. It also adds a new term > biol:morePrecise for linking from a Taxonomy to a more precise Taxonomy. > Examples 3.7 and 3.8 are new, and demonstrate these new features. > > Lastly, having looked at ubio.org as you suggested, I've made biol:rank > into a sub-property of ubio:taxonomicGroup, but having not been able to > find an RDFS file for ubio, I'm not 100% sure this is correct, so it is > at risk of reversal. > > -- > Toby A Inkster > <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> > <http://tobyinkster.co.uk> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 7 October 2008 08:14:03 UTC