Re: RDFa with multiple CURIEs as property..

Hi Svante,

> No longer in need, Dan Brickley was so kind to show me the feature has
> merit.
> Since often rdf vocabularies overlap in scope, and instances might have
> multiple audiences.
>
> Therefore I will suggest the ODF TC to overtake the property.

That's great.

But I would reiterate that I believe you should adopt RDFa in its
entirety, rather than looking for opportunities to fork the
specification, leading to the possibility of confusing people.

In other words, whilst it's of course good news that you now see the
merits of some particular feature, that should not be relevant when it
comes to the question of language integration.

Sorry to sound hard-nosed about this, but I think it would be really
counter-productive if we were to go through exactly the same loop
again next week, when some other feature doesn't seem obviously
useful.

...just take the whole shebang! :)


> Thanks for your patience, Mark.

Not at all. ;)

Regards,

Mark

-- 
Mark Birbeck, webBackplane

mark.birbeck@webBackplane.com

http://webBackplane.com/mark-birbeck

webBackplane is a trading name of Backplane Ltd. (company number
05972288, registered office: 2nd Floor, 69/85 Tabernacle Street,
London, EC2A 4RR)

Received on Friday, 31 October 2008 18:54:51 UTC