- From: SWD Issue Tracker <dean+cgi@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 10:53:18 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-swd-wg@w3.org,public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
ISSUE-157: SKOS and OWL 2 analysis http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/157 Raised by: Sean Bechhofer On product: SKOS >From Peter Patel-Schneider [1]: I would very much have liked more of SKOS to fit within OWL 2 DL. I believe that many of the parts of SKOS that do not fit within OWL 2 DL are modelling errors. To show what could be changed I have performed an analysis (from the reference document, not from the RDF document) of the bits of SKOS that are not in OWL 1 DL. For those bits that are not in OWL 2 DL, I have suggestions on how SKOS could be changed to make it fit within OWL 2 DL, where I could figure this out. I believe that having as much of SKOS in OWL 2 DL would be of benefit to SKOS. I note that many of the bits that are not OWL 2 DL are in examples, indicating to me that they are not so central to SKOS. Section Language What bit / Suggestions to put into OWL 2 DL skos:Concept OWL 2 DL individual/class/property punning (examples) Concept Schemes OWL 2 DL individual/ontology "punning" (example) Lexical Labels OWL 2 Full subproperty of rdfs:label suggestion: don't use rdfs:label OWL 2 DL property disjointness not OWL axiom schema for unique prefLabel suggestion: include qualified cardinality restrictions only for languages used (defined using datatype restrictions) OWL 2 DL individual / class punning (example) OWL 2 Full objects as values of data property (example) suggestion: don't do this Notations extra datatypes various extra datatypes suggestion: sort of in OWL 1 DL already, but unlikely to be supported by many tools Documentation OWL 2 Full using literal in object property (examples) suggestion: don't do this OWL 2 Full use of rdf:value (example) suggestion: don't use rdf:value OWL 2 DL individual/class punning (example) Semantic Rel's OWL 2 DL disjoint properties Concept Coll'ns OWL 2 Full ordering with typing suggestion: see below Mapping Props OWL 2 DL disjoint properties SKOS X OWL 2 Full data property chains suggestion: ?? Here is a way of handling typed ordering that should fit within OWL 2 DL, although I haven't checked all the details. Declaration( ObjectProperty(skos:firstMember) ) Declaration( ObjectProperty(skos:nextMembers) ) Declaration( ObjectProperty(skos:otherMembers) ) FunctionalProperty(skos:firstMember) FunctionalProperty(skos:nextMembers) PropertyDomain( skos:firstMember skos:OrderedCollection ) PropertyRange( skos:firstMember UnionOf(skos:Concept skos:ConceptScheme) ) ?? PropertyDomain( skos:nextMembers skos:OrderedCollection ) PropertyDomain( skos:nextMembers skos:OrderedCollection ) PropertyDomain( skos:otherMembers skos:OrderedCollection ) PropertyDomain( skos:otherMembers skos:OrderedCollection ) SubPropertyOf( skos:nextMembers skos:otherMembers ) SubPropertyOf( PropertyChain(skos:otherMembers skos:nextMembers) skos:otherMembers ) SubPropertyOf( skos:firstMember skos:member ) SubpropertyOf( PropertyChain(skos:otherMembers skos:firstMember) skos:member ) [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0018.html
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2008 10:53:53 UTC