Re: life after REC

On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 05:40:22 +0200, Manu Sporny
<msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:

>
> Ben Adida wrote:
>> If possible, spend a few minutes determining critical pieces you'd like
>> us to address as a group. If nothing, then nothing, but if something
>> important, let's discuss.
>
> Here are a couple that will affect adoption of RDFa outside of XHTML:
>
> 1. Determining the correct use of @prefix for specifying CURIEs.
> 2. #include-like feature for specifying inclusion of vocabulary
>    documents (possibly via @prefix).
> 3. A method for specifying reserved words in vocabulary documents which
>    are then used by RDFa parsers.
> 4. Use of the above three items for supporting Microformats-like markup.

5. Use of an external mechanism to add implicit rdfa, rather than having
to add explicit attributes:

	<dl class="familytree">
	<dt>Steven Pemberton</dt>
	<dd><dl>
		<dt>Astrid Kerssens</dt>
		<dd><dl>
			<dt>Julian Pemberton-Kerssens</dt>
			<dd></dd>
			<dt>Lucien Pemberton-Kerssens</dt>
			<dd></dd>
		    </dl>
		</dd>
	    </dl>
	</dd>
	</dl>

I would like to generate triples including

	"Steven Pemberton" genealogy:partner 	"Astrid Kerssens"
	"Steven Pemberton" genealogy:parent	"Julian Pemberton-Kerssens"
	etc.

Steven

Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 10:24:48 UTC