[Announcement] RDFa-deployed Multimedia Metadata - ramm.x
meeting record: 2007-07-26 RDFa telecon
[RDFa] non-binding resolutions
Telecon Agenda, 26 July 2007, 1500 UTC
Mapping hAudio Microformat to RDFa
moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
- Re: moving forward!
For info...
Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
- Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42)
Meeting record 2007-07-19
Telecon Agenda - Thursday 19 July 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
extracting data from child elements
anonymous abouts (blank node creation)
[RDFa application] MLE - mailing list archives explorer
[RDFa] ISSUE-34: partial resolution to @href everywhere
[RDFa] Meeting record: 2007-07-12 RDF-in-XHTML telecon
[RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute
[RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa
[RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
- RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type)
[RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa
[RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- RE: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
- Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston
subject representation
Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META, link to ISSUE-12
Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere
[RDFa] A summary of @rel everywhere
Scribe Schedule
[RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META
[RDFa] ISSUE-34: @href everywhere and non-information resources
Programmed regrets
[RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve
A Proposal for subject setting by @class
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class
- Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class
meeting record: 2007-07-05 RDFa Telecon
today telecon
Action Item Status for Shane
Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type