public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from July 2007 by author

Ben Adida

• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: [RDFa] non-binding resolutions (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Friday, 27 July)
• [RDFa] non-binding resolutions (Thursday, 26 July)
• Telecon Agenda, 26 July 2007, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 26 July)
• moving forward! (Monday, 23 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Thursday, 19 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Thursday, 19 July)
• Telecon Agenda - Thursday 19 July 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: extracting data from child elements (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: extracting data from child elements (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Monday, 16 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-34: partial resolution to @href everywhere (Friday, 13 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Thursday, 12 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere (Thursday, 12 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Wednesday, 11 July)
• [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: subject representation (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META, link to ISSUE-12 (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: PROPOSE to RESOLVE (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] A summary of @rel everywhere (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: Scribe Schedule (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere (Monday, 9 July)
• [RDFa] A summary of @rel everywhere (Monday, 9 July)
• Scribe Schedule (Monday, 9 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META (Monday, 9 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-34: @href everywhere and non-information resources (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class (Monday, 9 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve (Saturday, 7 July)
• A Proposal for subject setting by @class (Saturday, 7 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Wednesday, 4 July)
• Telecon Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Wednesday, 4 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-1: PROPOSE to RESOLVE (Wednesday, 4 July)
• [RDFa] ISSUE-9: META and LINK in the body (Wednesday, 4 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (Wednesday, 4 July)
• [RDFa] RESOLUTIONS to ISSUE-2, ISSUE-5, ISSUE-25, ISSUE-29, ISSUE-4 (Wednesday, 4 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Tuesday, 3 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Sunday, 1 July)

Brian Suda

• Re: extracting data from child elements (Wednesday, 18 July)
• extracting data from child elements (Wednesday, 18 July)

Christoph

• Re: subject representation (Wednesday, 11 July)
• subject representation (Wednesday, 11 July)

Christoph Hanke

• ESem Wiki - a Semantic Wiki using RDFa (Monday, 2 July)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Monday, 30 July)

Dan Connolly

• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)

Diego Berrueta

• Re: [RDFa application] MLE - mailing list archives explorer (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)

Hausenblas, Michael

• [Announcement] RDFa-deployed Multimedia Metadata - ramm.x (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: Telecon Agenda, 26 July 2007, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Friday, 20 July)
• RE: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Friday, 20 July)
• RE: [RDFa application] MLE - mailing list archives explorer (Wednesday, 18 July)
• RE: extracting data from child elements (Wednesday, 18 July)
• [RDFa application] MLE - mailing list archives explorer (Wednesday, 18 July)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa (Friday, 13 July)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• [RDFa] Meeting record: 2007-07-12 RDF-in-XHTML telecon (Thursday, 12 July)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• RE: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Wednesday, 11 July)
• RE: Scribe Schedule (Tuesday, 10 July)
• RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• RE: Telecon Thursday, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Thursday, 5 July)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Tuesday, 31 July)
• Re: [RDFa] non-binding resolutions (Tuesday, 31 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Tuesday, 31 July)
• Re: [RDFa] non-binding resolutions (Saturday, 28 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: [RDFa] non-binding resolutions (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Mapping hAudio Microformat to RDFa (Tuesday, 24 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Monday, 23 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Monday, 23 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Monday, 23 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Monday, 23 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Monday, 23 July)
• For info... (Sunday, 22 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Friday, 20 July)
• Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Wednesday, 18 July)
• anonymous abouts (blank node creation) (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-34: partial resolution to @href everywhere (Saturday, 14 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa (Friday, 13 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Friday, 13 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Friday, 13 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] A summary of @rel everywhere (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve (Sunday, 8 July)
• Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class (I may be wrong!) (Sunday, 8 July)
• Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class (Sunday, 8 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: META and LINK in the body (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)

Karl Dubost

• Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Thursday, 26 July)

Keith Alexander

• Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Sunday, 8 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Sunday, 8 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Tuesday, 3 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-28: following your nose to the RDFa specification (Sunday, 1 July)

Knud Hinnerk Möller

• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Monday, 30 July)

Manu Sporny

• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: Mapping hAudio Microformat to RDFa (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Mapping hAudio Microformat to RDFa (Monday, 23 July)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Tuesday, 31 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Monday, 30 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (was: ISSUE-42) (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: Determination of subjects/objects (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa (Friday, 13 July)
• Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] Telecon Agenda, Thursday 12 July, 1500 UTC, 1100 Boston (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: [RDFa] A summary of @rel everywhere (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: A Proposal for subject setting by @class (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: the Creative Commons take on @href everywhere (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: nested LINK and META (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-9: META and LINK in the body (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Wednesday, 4 July)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: moving forward! (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: moving forward! (Wednesday, 25 July)
• Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: anonymous abouts (blank node creation) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: the @src attribute (Thursday, 19 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)

Ralph R. Swick

• meeting record: 2007-07-26 RDFa telecon (Thursday, 26 July)
• meeting record: 2007-07-05 RDFa Telecon (Thursday, 5 July)

Shane McCarron

• Re: Telecon Agenda, 26 July 2007, 1500 UTC (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-55: CURIEs or QNames in XHTML1.1+RDFa (Friday, 13 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-42: @src, following up, proposal to resolve (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Action Item Status for Shane (Thursday, 5 July)

Simone Onofri

• Programmed regrets (Sunday, 8 July)
• today telecon (Thursday, 5 July)

Steven Pemberton

• Meeting record 2007-07-19 (Thursday, 19 July)
• Why I don't like 'instanceof' (was Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type) (Thursday, 19 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3 @class and @role for rdf:type (Thursday, 5 July)

Thomas Baker

• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-8: RDF containers in RDFa (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-3: syntactic sugar for rdf:type (Tuesday, 17 July)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 July 2007 10:02:46 UTC