Monday, 31 January 2011
Friday, 28 January 2011
Tuesday, 25 January 2011
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
Monday, 24 January 2011
Saturday, 22 January 2011
Friday, 21 January 2011
Saturday, 22 January 2011
Friday, 21 January 2011
- Re: SWEET (but not friendly) ontologies
- Re: SWEET (but not friendly) ontologies
- CFP: Special Issue on Semantic Sensor Networks
- Re: SWEET (but not friendly) ontologies
- Re: SWEET (but not friendly) ontologies
- RE: SWEET (but not friendly) ontologies
- SWEET (but not friendly) ontologies
- Re: How to declare in a web app's interface which kind of app/version/features and or interfaces or formats it exposes
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
Thursday, 20 January 2011
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: Standardizing linked data - was Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Standardizing linked data - was Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: How to declare in a web app's interface which kind of app/version/features and or interfaces or formats it exposes
- 2nd CfP: USEWOD2011 - 1st International Workshop on Usage Analysis and the Web of Data
- Re: How to declare in a web app's interface which kind of app/version/features and or interfaces or formats it exposes
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: How to declare in a web app's interface which kind of app/version/features and or interfaces or formats it exposes
- How to declare in a web app's interface which kind of app/version/features and or interfaces or formats it exposes
- Re: Nice domain name for the take
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Nice domain name for the take
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Workshop: Why, Where and How?" of Linked Data
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Fwd: Vocabulary of a Friend (VOAF)
Wednesday, 19 January 2011
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: AW: ANN: DBpedia 3.6 released
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- AW: ANN: DBpedia 3.6 released
- Re: ANN: DBpedia 3.6 released
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Post-doc and Senior Researcher Positions at the Ontology Engineering Group (UPM)
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Call for Use Cases: Social uses and other new uses of Library Linked Data - from W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
Friday, 14 January 2011
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- ESWC2011: Call for Sponsors
- Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] ANN: DBpedia 3.6 released
- Re: ANN: geometry2rdf software library
- Re: Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?
Monday, 17 January 2011
- Re: Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?
- RE: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?
- Re: Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?
- Re: ICWE 2011: Second Call for Papers
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- RE: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- RE: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Property for linking from a graph to HTTP connection meta-data?
- 2nd CfP: Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2011) Workshop at WWW2011
- ICWE 2011: Second Call for Papers
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- ANN: DBpedia 3.6 released
- Re: ANN: geometry2rdf software library
- Re: ANN: geometry2rdf software library
- Re: ANN: geometry2rdf software library
- ANN: geometry2rdf software library
Friday, 14 January 2011
Saturday, 15 January 2011
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
Friday, 14 January 2011
- Request for Feedback and Suggestions on a vocabulary that extends geo into an "Area" with a radius in meters and uses the new ietf.org geo URI
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Introducing Vocabularies of a Friend (VOAF)
- Re: What triple does an HTTP see Other imply?
- Re: simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: What triple does an HTTP see Other imply?
- What triple does an HTTP see Other imply?
Thursday, 13 January 2011
- Ontology of Rough Sets
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- RE: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Semantics of rdfs:seeAlso (Was: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?)
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
Wednesday, 12 January 2011
- ESWC 2011-CfP: LinkedLearning 2011 - 1st International Workshop on eLearning Approaches for the Linked Data Age
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Reverse Links and HTTP Referer
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- CFP: International Workshop on Semantic Technologies for Information-Integrated Collaboration (STIIC 2011) @CTS 2011 - (Submission Deadline: January 24, 2011)
- Reverse Links and HTTP Referer
Tuesday, 11 January 2011
- Call for Papers & Demos: Semantic Publication Workshop SePublica@ESWC (May 29 or 30, Crete, Greece) – Deadline Feb 28
- RE: simple LOD browser for a a demo system [UNCLASSIFIED]
- Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- Re: simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- Re: [Dbpedia-discussion] simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- Re: simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- Re: simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- Re: simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- simple LOD browser for a a demo system
- Call for Chapter Proposal: “Cases on Open-Linked Data and Semantic Web Applications”
- RE: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case
- Call for Papers: i-Society 2011!
Monday, 10 January 2011
- Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case
- RE: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case
- Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case
- RE: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case
- Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- RE: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case
- Re: best practice relation for linking to image/machine-opaque docs? biomedical use case
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
Sunday, 9 January 2011
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- CFP SEMSEARCH'11 at WWW - 4th Semantic Search Workshop
Saturday, 8 January 2011
Friday, 7 January 2011
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- FWD: CfP "THEORISING DEVELOPMENT AND TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE"
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- RE: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- RE: {Disarmed} Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- RE: {Disarmed} Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Fully funded PhD position in Semantic Search, Linked Data and Adaptive Web
Thursday, 6 January 2011
- ESWC 2011- CfP: Workshop on User Profile Data on the Social Semantic Web (UWeb)
- {Disarmed} Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Is it best practices to use a rdfs:seeAlso link to a potentially multimegabyte PDF?, existing predicate for linking to PDF?
- Re: ANN: Powerful PHP library for consuming GoodRelations data
Wednesday, 5 January 2011
- Re: ANN: razorbase back online (code available)
- CfP: Making Sense of Microposts (#MSM2011)
- Call for applications (BSc and MSc students from the US, UK and Canada) - Practical work in the filed of Linked Data usage analysis
Tuesday, 4 January 2011
- Re: ANN: razorbase back online (code available)
- Fwd: Job offer - Natural Solutions - Marseilles - France
- ANN: razorbase back online (code available)
- OWLED2011: Call for tutorials and demonstrations - deadline January 10 2011!
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Myhill-Nerode Theorem use in text processing, NLP and site classification for SW
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Re: Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?
- Is vCard range restriction on org:siteAddress necessary?