- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 21:21:31 +0100
- To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- CC: nathan@webr3.org, William Waites <ww@styx.org>, semantic-web@w3.org, public-lod@w3.org
Dear Martin, All, Just a reminder that you are looking at an old, outdated editors draft of the HTTP-in-RDF Vocabulary. The latest Public Working Draft is here: - <http://www.w3.org/TR/HTTP-in-RDF10/> I seem to recall updates to the vocabulary that allow more flexibility to support uses as the one described below by Martin (though I did not check back specifically for that case). Please note that the W3C/WAI Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group welcomes comments and feedback on HTTP-in-RDF (despite the long passed deadline). Please send comments to <public-earl10-comments@w3.org>. Best, Shadi On 17.1.2011 20:23, Nathan wrote: > William Waites wrote: >> * [2011-01-17 16:39:27 +0100] Martin Hepp >> <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> écrit: >> >> ] Does anybody know of a standard property for linking a RDF graph to >> a ] http:GetRequest, http:Connection, or http:Response instance? Maybe >> ] rdfs:seeAlso (@TBL: ;- ))? >> >> If you suppose that the name of the graph is the same as the >> request URI (it will not always be, of course) you can link >> in the other direction from http:Request using http:requestURI. >> I am not sure that http:requestURI has a standard inverse though. > > And remember of course, that the headers are split in to different > groups which relate to different things, many relate to the message (in > relation to the request), some relate to the server, some relate to the > entity (an encoded version of the representation for messaging) a few > (really not many) relate to the representation itself, and a couple > relate to the resource itself, the resource being the thing the URI > identifies. > > Best, > > Nathan > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Monday, 17 January 2011 20:22:09 UTC