Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>wrote:

>  On 1/19/11 10:59 AM, Nathan wrote:
>
> htTp://lists.W3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011Jan/ - Personally I'd
> hope that any statements made using these URIs (asserted by man or machine)
> would remain valid regardless of the (incorrect?-)casing.
>
> Okay for Data Source Address Ref. (URL), no good for Entity (Data Item or
> Data Object) Name Ref., bar system specific handling via IFP property or
> owl:sameAs :-)
>

Kingsley, same for you as Nathan. To what specification do you refer to for
the definitions and behavior of:
 - "Data source address ref"
 - Entity
 - Statement.

-Alan


>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Kingsley Idehen	
> President & CEO
> OpenLink Software
> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
>
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 04:28:43 UTC