- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 16:31:07 -0500
- To: Stephane Fellah <fellahst@gmail.com>
- CC: Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen@gmail.com>, Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4D32121B.3000001@openlinksw.com>
On 1/15/11 2:23 PM, Stephane Fellah wrote: > Sounds very interesting initiative. Based on my understanding, I think > it should be possible to write a tool that read any OWL document and > generate a VOAF document. May be Swoogle could be a good starting > point, but not sure how the API can provide the list of ontology > namespaces through the REST API. The imports section would corresponds > to the imports statement. The tools would count the number of classes > and properties in the ontology namespace. It would be interesting to > aggregate all this information and see which vocabularies have the > most influence using SNA algorithms. You can also make SPARQL CONSTRUCTs against: http://lod.openlinksw.com .. that's a massive quad store with most of the LOD cloud data sets. You can see effect via http://lod.openlinksw.com/fct (type in pattern: Ontology and then filter by Type or Attributes). Kingsley > > Best regards > Stephane Fellah > > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Kingsley Idehen > <kidehen@openlinksw.com <mailto:kidehen@openlinksw.com>> wrote: > > On 1/15/11 3:13 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote: >> Hi Bernard, >> >> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Bernard Vatant >> <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> wrote: >>> VOAF is of course a clear homage to FOAF, which is the hub of the network : >>> more than half of the listed vocabularies rely on it one way or another. >>> I've asked Dan Brickley a couple of days ago if he did not mind this >>> friendly hack. Without answer from him, I just went ahead following the >>> adage "Qui ne dit mot consent". >> Maybe it's just Saturday morning, but what exactly is the goal of your >> VOAF effort? What problems with existing ontologies does it address? >> Just curious, as it sounds interesting... >> >> Egon >> > Egon, > > If possible, please look at the links I posted in response to > Bernard's mail. > > You can also look at some of my tweets about voaf (Twitter: > hastag: #voaf) which shows how the following questions can be > answered: > > 1. What are the sources of terms used in a given vocabulary? > 2. Who authored the vocabularies in question? > 3. Which terms are most commonly used, across vocabularies, and > when where these vocabularies created? > > Basically, we have a vocabulary graph endowed with de-referencable > URIs that provides an extremely powerful mechanism for holistic > navigation of the LOD cloud or other data spaces (e.g. within > enterprise intranets). > > All of the above still skims the surface of what VOAF delivers :-) > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > President& CEO > OpenLink Software > Web:http://www.openlinksw.com > Weblog:http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen <http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/%7Ekidehen> > Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen > > > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Saturday, 15 January 2011 21:31:44 UTC