- From: Toby Inkster <tai@g5n.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 13:04:37 +0000
- To: Vasiliy Faronov <vfaronov@gmail.com>
- Cc: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, Peter DeVries <pete.devries@gmail.com>, public-lod@w3.org
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 18:21 +0300, Vasiliy Faronov wrote: > Maybe it's time to define several specializations of rdfs:seeAlso with > stronger semantics? Don't we already have enough of those? <s> powder-s:describedby <o> . # <o> provides some more information about <o>, often in a # machine-readable format. <s> rdfs:seeAlso <o> . # Like powder-s:describedby but perhaps more tangential. # <o> might have information on something similar to <s>; or # if <s> is a document, <o> might have information on the # things described by <s>. <s> foaf:page <o> . # <o> provides information about <s>, often in a human-readable # format. <s> rdfs:isDefinedBy <o> . # <o> provides the canonical definition of <s> . We also have foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf, various terms from the XHTML vocabulary (xhv:meta, xhv:next, xhv:prev, etc), various terms from Dublin Core (dc:source, dc:relation, dc:replaces/isReplacedBy, dc:references/isReferencedBy, dc:hasVersion/isVersionOf, dc:hasPart/isPartOf, dc:isFormatOf/hasFormat) and countless others. To answer the original question, I'd say foaf:page is a better predicate than rdfs:seeAlso for a large PDF. -- Toby A Inkster <mailto:mail@tobyinkster.co.uk> <http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
Received on Monday, 10 January 2011 13:05:27 UTC